Providing Christian resources from the YMCA past and present to nourish inclusive, equitable work in our diverse and global neighborhoods that build up healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
A candid and highly relevant reflection on YMCA mission creep in regard to its emphasis on spirit, mind and body; Christian principles; for all; and being a member association.
This article was originally published in the Jan. 2007 edition of Perspective 33.
The symbol of the YMCA mission is the inverted red triangle.
It was put forth by Luther Gulick in the late 19th century as a summation of the mission of the YMCA and has been adopted worldwide.
I came across the inverted triangle carved into stone one day on a walk on the Springfield College campus.
It was above the entrance to the Administration Building (one of the oldest on campus). The carving held a big surprise.
The triangle contained an open Bible; no surprise there.
The surprise was that the passage listed was Ephesians 4:13, not John 17:21.
What was Gulick trying to advance in selecting this passage?
I read Ephesians 4:13 – “until we all reach unity in the faith and knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.”
Then I read on in the chapter where the author calls to having the “body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grow and build itself up in love as each part does its work.”
Still more, the author calls on all to be children of light and details all that means.
It was a call to fullness of life and being that the triangle symbolized and Gulick advocated, rediscovered and taught, and with the YMCA incorporated into its mission and being.
This is the tap root of all the mission statements of the YMCA.
It is where we came from and articulates a wholeness that is advocated and sought for all who enter the association.
There has been drift over the years. Let’s look at it.
There has been great concern about openness.
Some attack the word “Christian” in our name as a denial of openness.
Yet the Christian faith, is by its own documentation, open.
Listen to the words of Saint Paul: “In Christ there is neither male nor female, Jew nor Greek, circumcised or uncircumcised, bond nor free.”
That is universal, and that was the root of YMCA openness and of the most Christian aspects of the Movement worldwide.
There is a real danger to openness and that shows itself in some mission statements and drift.
It is far too easy for people to come to the YMCA with no knowledge of the organization or its mission and attempt to capture and /or redefine it.
It is easy to ignore one or more of the aspects of the fullness of life that the YMCA stands for and to emphasize only body or mind or spirit, although the latter two are not usually culprits in this mission distortion.
There is still another danger – the danger of selling the mission.
The YMCA puts its emphasis on buildings and plant far too often, and not on people, and what happens to people, in plants.
The results can be, and far too often is a distortion of mission for the sake of the marginal membership and the marginal contribution and source of revenue.
The temptation is to be all things to all people and winding up as nothing to anyone.
I have sat on YMCA boards that put people on the board that knew nothing about the YMCA or its mission (for them this was another form of compulsory community service to look good on their resume and to their employer), and who cared less.
They were on the board to raise money and only for that reason.
Their board attendance was marginal, and their lack of understanding the YMCA when they did attend meetings did little or nothing to further the mission or ends of the YMCA.
Instead, they often undermined the nature and very purpose of the organization and led it away from both the inclusiveness it stands for and the wholeness it attempts to bring to the lives of its members.
Here I bring out a fact that is basic to the mission and nature of the YMCA.
It is an association, a member association.
The members are the association.
This undermines efforts that you see to say that this is a community organization or to make broad claims which facts and realities do not and cannot support.
Since people and communities are different, YMCAs will be different and this leads to an important aspect of considering mission.
Each YMCA will state its mission and realize its mission in its own way in its own time and place.
This variety is both a strength and a weakness.
The strength is that this leaves room for mission interpretation, creativity, and experimentation.
The weakness is that we can lose sight of the great heritage in which we stand and the great mission that we inherit and pass along; to help people rise to the fullness of being children of God.
Vision-casting at the turn of the millennium on the legacy and future of the YMCA, it’s Christian faith and works in our modern age:
“For the essential genius of the YMCA does not concern techniques, management, buildings, but reaches by God’s grace, into hearts, minds and bodies and strengthens them in wholeness and offers a unifying purpose that is needed and longed for.
God created something unique in the YMCA and works uniquely in the YMCA in spite of all of us. Again and again God has reshaped and renewed this organization, and it is my prayer that we, who have this great gift in our lives and time will be open to ways God will make all things new in this new century and always.”
“This Is A Day Of New Beginnings”
By Harold C. Smith / September 6, 2000 / Silver Bay YMCA, NY
Reproduced and Distributed at Springfield College to the inaugural OnPrinciple cohort by Mike Bussey, Chair of Friends of the Jerusalem YMCA
“The faith that brought the YMCA into being is a faith of ever new beginnings.
“Behold I make all things new” God proclaims in the Book of Revelation.
We are to embrace this newness and work with and for it.
That was a motive of mine when I called for this seminar and meeting. I appreciate the response.
It confirms I was not alone in my concern and thinking. I hope I can help move us into the new century in a revitalized and dedicated way.
My concern is the Christian part of our very name.
When I read the inspiring words of the former leaders of the Y, I am astonished by their vision and inspiration.
They envisioned “mobilizing the Lay Forces of Christianity” and “The Evangelization of the World in This Generation.”
They meant it and so did the Y.
When I look at our meetings and publications I don’t perceive vision or fire. That is a bad sign; “For without vision, people will perish.”
Let’s look at what we are and where we are and see if light comes onto the problems.
There is a feeling Christianity compromises our openness.
Yet the Christianity of the YMCA had as its core is John 17:21 “that they all may be one.”
This Christianity has always been inclusive.
Indeed, one of the most Christian aspects of the YMCA as I have known it is this openness and acceptance of everyone.
This said, there are dangers in openness.
We can be perceived, and are, as being all things to all people and ending up as being nothing to no one.
There is also a danger of being captured, shanghaied as it were, because of being open.
This could yield attempts to subvert or reinvent our association, its purpose and its mission.
Still further, there is the danger of assimilation. Of becoming part of a secular culture, or as a part of an American “state religion” in general.
Those who went before us realized this yet remained open.
Because it is in the very nature of the Christian faith as they understood it and it was an integral part of what they hoped for in a YMCA.
It was to be a community rooted and grounded on the love they perceived God had for everyone in sending the world Jesus as the Christ.
Now the YMCA was lay movement. Early on it agreed not to be theological or doctrinal.
But it also agreed to be inspired, moved and illuminated by God’s Word in the Bible as they understood it.
The YMCA wasn’t conceived with the right beliefs and confessions but with Christian action and life: “By their fruits you shall know them.”
And what fruit the Y brought forth and continues to bring forth!
The world is better for the YMCA; lives are better because of the YMCA.
In many ways faith in action worked.
But there are dangers here too.
It is harder to live faith than be doctrinaire about faith.
This is especially true of Christianity, a subtle faith without signs (except the signs of Jonah).
The Y position was: we will live our Christian faith and others will be attracted by that faith in life and perhaps catch it.
The YMCA approach as its best is magnificent and effective and at its worst is a disaster.
It assumes a deep, nourished, renewed and renewing faith on the part of those who would live it.
And this leads to the role association plays.
The YMCA creates community at the same time it serves as leaven in the larger communities it is part of.
For the member the goal is the loving community envisioned by prophets, Christ and the early church leaders.
That community helps people reach their highest potential, and unity of mind, body and spirit (as Luther Gulick of Springfield College pointed out) under God.
What a need there is for this association.
We live in fractured communities living fractionated lives and desperately need the wholeness the YMCA has pointed to, and, at its best, delivered.
But this community is not an end in itself.
It has as its mission to change not only individuals by bringing them to wholeness but by bringing larger communities to wholeness under God.
For the Y serves a God of not only unity but peace and justice.
The function of the Y is not to reflect a community but redeem it; to lift it to new levels and promise.
The Y does this one person at a time, and by mobilizing those touched by the unity and purpose under God the Y can offer to reach out to others. And what creative reaching out there has been, and what scope there is for more yet to be done, and not just locally.
From the earliest days the YMCA has had a world outlook, purpose and mission.
That mission, the product of the unity of a person under God, had and continues to have an appeal that transcends borders, cultures and historic baggage.
For the essential genius of the YMCA does not concern techniques, management, buildings, but reaches by God’s grace, into hearts, minds and bodies and strengthens them in wholeness and offers a unifying purpose that is needed and longed for.
God created something unique in the YMCA and works uniquely in the YMCA in spite of all of us.
Again and again God has reshaped and renewed this organization, and it is my prayer that we, who have this great gift in our lives and time will be open to ways God will make all things new in this new century and always.”
Professor Brunner is considered one of the greatest European Christian theologians in the early to mid 20th century. His enormous and brilliant influence on the YMCA is revealed in this essay he penned, inspired by his friendship with John R. Mott, to encourage and guide the Y in their faithfulness to Christ amidst a radically swift-changing post-war culture in Britain, Germany, and America.
The posted article below is an excerpt by Emil Brunner from Toward Our Second Century, a report of the plenary meeting of the World’s Committee of the Young Men’s Christian Organization at Geneva, Switzerland in July, 1953. Archived by the World Alliance YMCA
————————-
“From its very beginning the YMCA has set great store by the fact that it is not a church.
It has rather exhorted its members to join a church. This conception and policy has stood the test and will remain the same in the future.
The ecumenical movement, however, and more especially the creation of the World Council of Churches, has required a re-thinking which, of course, has to start from and be based upon the New Testament.
If we read without prejudice what the New Testament says about Ecclesia, we see that this word signifies a reality which resembles the YMCA at least as much as today’s so-called churches.
The bodies which generally are recognized as “churches” are at least as different from the Ecclesia of the New Testament as the YMCA.
For Ecclesia is nothing else than a brotherhood of people bound together with Jesus Christ and with each other by the Holy Spirit and leading their daily life in such fellowship.
The Ecclesia is described to us as a common life under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, a common life in Faith, in Hope, and in Love, where what we are used to calling characteristic features of a church, “ecclesiastical” institutions, ecclesiastical offices, ecclesiastical actives do not play an essential role.
The following points deserve attention:
There is no distinction between priests and laymen, but the whole community is “a priestly people”, everybody is expected to to act in a priestly manner.
There is no sacrificial rite, but on the contrary: by the sacrifice of Christ all other sacrifices are done away forever, whereas everybody, each member of the community, is supposed to dedicate his or her life to God as an acceptable sacrifice.
Each member of the community is called upon for service in the community. There is no difference between “active” and “passive” members, but, as each organ within a living organism exercises its function to the benefit of the whole, thus everybody within the Ecclesia is an organ fit for a function of which a “service” is expected and rendered. Non-active members have to be regarded as non-functioning dead organs and be cut off.
There are certainly special Sunday meetings of the community for “worship”. But again, what matters most is that everybody contributes to the edification of the community, that nobody is passed over because some want to monopolize speaking.
But these Sunday meetings of the community are not called Divine Service. On the contrary the daily life of the individual Christians, who dedicate their life to God as sacrifice, explicitly receive this title. Therefore, everyday life in the service of men in love is the genuine divine service.
For this reason there is such a gulf, characteristic of our ecclesiastical life, between “Divine Service and Everyday Life”, between a “spiritual” and a “profane” realm outside. Everything is “spiritual” – even the most secular thing, if it is done united with Christ; then also eating and drinking then also trivial everyday work is “spiritual” if it is done “in Christ”.
If therefore the members of a YMCA by their faith are really united with Christ and the love which is flowing out of this faith unites them with the fellow members that they feel as brethren, and if these members regard their activities as service to Christ and to the brethren and sacrifice their lives in this service, they are Ecclesia as well as any church.
This insight is of utmost importance because it permits us to conceive our “secular” work, be it in sports groups, in professional evening classes, in manual work of the Boy’s Town in Indian slums, as spiritual work, as “church work in the meaning of the New Testament.”
Not the subject itself, Bible Study or sports, but the motive for the one as for the other: to serve Christ and to serve the brother, constitutes the difference between spiritual and non-spiritual; not the affiliation to a certain church makes our work Christian, but the belonging to Christ of each worker.
On the other hand, this insight makes us independent from the principle of “practical success.”
There are other organizations today, UNO, UNESCO, international emergency organizations or individual governments, doing the same as we do, seen from the outside, doing it even better than we can because of more money available to them.
Yet it is quite another thing, as it does not spring forth from the source of love of Christ and therefore is not realized in the same spirit.
Our social work does not have its value in itself, but as a demonstration of the love of Christ.
We are not a YMCA because of the model swimming pools available to everyone, but because we build and use a swimming pool to bring the love of Christ to young men.
The YMCA has little importance as an institution of welfare.
The YMCA either is a form of Ecclesia or it is nothing.
If it is not Ecclesia it is useless, amateurish duplicate of public welfare institutions.
Thus we arrive at this peculiar statement: the YMCA is inwardly Ecclesia, church in the meaning of the New Testament; outwardly it is a welfare institution for young people of all nations.
The fact that it unites this interior with this exterior makes its character and is the basis of its peculiar, incomparable activity.
There are, therefore, two dangerous deviations which may cause the YMCA to miss its destiny.
The first: that it loses its soul, that it ceases to be Ecclesia.
The second: that it loses its particular body, that it becomes a mere institution of one of the churches, a “church youth group” whose main purpose is Bible study.
The first one is wrong extraversion, the second a wrong intraversion.
In the first case, the YMCA ceases to be Christian; in the second case it ceases to be YMCA.
The centenary of the year 1955 must help each local and national YMCA all over the world to grasp this insight of the homogeneousness of body and soul and to win back the soul which the YMCA has lost in many places.
There is less danger for the exterior, for the “body” of the YMCA; for this exterior social service is evident to everybody and can be started rather easily.
The main danger is the first, the loss of the Christian soul, the character as Ecclesia.
The most important task of the Ecclesia in the New Testament is to make Christ known to all men.
Therefore the most important task of the YMCA is to win the youth of our time for Christ. Youth for Christ, Christ for Youth.
Whether this is done by swimming pools, evening classes, sports training or Bible and Prayer Meetings is not the main question.
What matters only is the aim that young people come into a living contact with Christ.
This, however, can only happen if the Bible is read, where it is preached; and where experiences are shared in a heartfelt, sincere, brotherly manner.
The soul of the YMCA cannot live without being nurtured and purified by the sources of faith.
We may imagine the ideal YMCA a society of young people looking very worldly, open to everybody, which is attractive by its activities for young people and renders service to them. But while it looks rather worldly from the outside, the leading men inside are eager to speak to the young people of Jesus Christ as soon as they ask: why are you doing that? why are you so kind to us? why are you interested in just me?
To proclaim the message of Jesus Christ with a few words in such moments, to explain what actually is a YMCA – that is the proper aim.
The YMCA is a proof that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is no “religion” but the love of men based upon the love of God.
Therefore it is possible to bear witness to Christ by simple exterior services.
Where there is real love towards men, there Christ is at work; where Christ really is at work, there is genuine love towards men.
The foundation of Ecclesia is God’s Love in Jesus Christ, received and accepted by human hearts.
There is no need for a creed, even the Paris Basis, a model of brevity.
Who loves Christ and is willing to obey Him belongs to it. Who does not love Him and does not obey Him does not belong to it.
The love of Christ is the sole criterion; the unquestionable manifestation of this love to Christ is love to the brethren, willingness to serve the brethren.
Therefore the “Christian Religion” is something so simple, something so ecclesiastical, something so laymen-like.
That is why the YMCA has such an extraordinarily good chance to serve Christ.
The churches have their particular values and services and the YMCA cannot do better than remain on a good relationship with them all.
They certainly have much to give to their members which the YMCA cannot provide.
But, it is able to give the most essential to young people if its soul, its hidden innermost, is the communion with Christ, which moves it to act and guides it, that is to say if it really is a kind of Ecclesia.”
———————————
Professor Brunner is considered one of the greatest European Christian theologians in the early to mid 20th century. His enormous and brilliant influence on the YMCA is revealed in this essay he penned, inspired by his friendship with John R. Mott, to encourage and guide the Y in their faithfulness to Christ amidst a radically swift-changing post-war culture in Britain, Germany, and America.