Is the YMCA Still Religious? Still Christian? Really?

Yes.

That’s my answer, based on my experience and perspective.

If so, then what is the future of historically religious organizations like the YMCA and the church in America and Western Civilization?

What is the future of historically religious organizations like the YMCA and churches in North America and Western Civilization?

Can the Y adapt and survive as a faith-based institution in these days and decades ahead?

The question still gets asked (and googled): Is the Y still religious? Is it still Christian? Does the answer still matter?

My answer is Yes, Yes, and Yes.

The spirit-full foundations go down deep, our origins and history are rich in this regard; Martti Muukkonen writes candidly (and well-researched) about this at length.

This extended reflection below on the reality and role of religion and Christianity in the Y hopefully will spur a constructive yet critical conversation that “builds a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.”

For me, context is often key to discerning what factors are shaping us now, where they are sourced, and what it is arcing towards.

Oversimplification can be a way of starting to make sense of complex and ambiguous circumstances.

By combining broader insights, one can begin to discern relevant insights – the questions then follow on how it seems to correspond with our experience and awareness of reality.

What is reality? How to describe it?

As St. Paul muses with the Corinthian Christians in the mid first century – we can only see and know partially – this includes love, the present, ourselves, the cosmos.

Everyone has multiple lens through which we see and interpret the world, and a myriad of biases that shape how you participate in and interpret it; some we become aware of, many we don’t.

What is the reality of the YMCA and the church in America these days?

How is it really doing? Well? Amazing? Poorly? Disgraceful? Compared to what? Utopia? Dystopia? Status quo?

What kind of criteria should we use?

Numbers? Stories? Time? Facilities? Conversions? Members? Likes?

To ask more probing questions: what is the role of religion in reality?

What is the value of the Christian religion in historical reality?

What is the foundation of Protestant churches in America?

What are the religious roots of the YMCA’s existence and success? And failures?

Should the original religious (and cultural/political) purposes of the YMCA have an enduring authority to determine our missional and organizational health or viability?

For the sake of this article, I’m humbly attempting to add to the growing conversation in a meaningful and nuanced way the role of faith and religion as a dimension of diversity in the YMCA.

Some of my key assumptions:

+ “religion” is the most dynamic and pervading dimension of reality (religion also defined as faith tradition or existential ideology).

+ North America is a highly religious continent and full of religious-shaped cultures, and every institution is profoundly affected by religion, either caught in its orbit or resisting it in some manner.

+ organized faith traditions are public institutions (often as 501(c)3 non-profits), and local congregations are crucial manifestations of religious traditions and values in its vast variety (like caring for the poor and children, spiritual formation, etc.); participants in it cover the full spectrum of adherence from high to low, passionate to cynical, educated to still learning.

+ for Christianity in its many religious manifestations, it is primarily expressed culturally and sociologically; thus it’s many branches and traditions and denominations and sects are reflections of the divisions generally understood between the Eastern and Western Civilizations, the Global North and Global South, Reformation and Counter-Reformations, Empires and Nationalism, Technological Adaptations in every sphere of human industry. And more….

+ religion in general is also an anthropological reality; a profound way of vulnerable humans striving in tribes for survival amidst the terrifying yet sustaining natural forces of Earth and the Milky Way and our Universe(s).

+ an enduring role of religion, according to Rene Girard, is to provide sustaining ways for communities to deal with the recurring murderous violence endemic to all people always – in order for a tribe to thrive in the dangerous natural world, they had to overcome the human pride and envy which continually tempts them to kill one another and destroy their capacity to organize and trust each other.

+ beyond the particular expressions of classic religions like Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. is the commonly observed role of religion in their tribes and nations of origins for surviving and thriving, making sense of their existence in particular geographies and generations, amidst the continual technological adaptions humans make out of necessity, opportunity and ability.

+ interestingly, the great religious traditions just mentioned are all originally Eastern Civilization realities, from the Middle/South; however they manifested and took root in the West, they are at their heart tribal, collectivist, and Eastern.

+ often “strengths” and “weakness” are two sides of the same coin, so to speak, or more about how the same tool is applied either appropriately or inappropriately – aka: to a hammer everything is a nail, or as in Ecclesiastes, there is a time for everything, including a time to plant and a time to uproot, to laugh and to weep – and it is wisdom to discern right timing and action.

+ the strengths and weaknesses of religion are similar: it provides boundaries for what is acknowledged as true and real, and most conducive to surviving and thriving of the tribe, and excludes those who deny or reject it; for those in acquiescence, the boundaries and exclusion are right and good, for those who resist or rebel, well they draw the opposing conclusion.

+ a strength and weakness of religion and cultures is the spectrum of individuality and collectivism, of the duty to love the tribe and sacrifice self, of the submission of self to a greater authority and tradition: to those who are drawn to the ends of the spectrums (hyper-individualistic vs. hyper-collectivist) the more divergent and dire are their differing descriptions of what is healthy vs sick…

+ all of this generalized oversimplification to highlight the Western context of the Protestant Reformation (Northern Europeans: German, Swiss, French) against the Catholic Church (Southern Europe: Italy), which itself was deeply shaped by the Great Schism five centuries earlier when the Western Roman Church broke from the Eastern Byzantine Church (a cultural, political, economic, geographical, hence a theological driven split)

+ three centuries into the Protestant Reformation (which also corresponded with the Renaissance and Enlightenment, Industrial Revolution, and Imperial transitions to Nation-States) emerged the Young Men’s Christian Association – a humanitarian and religious product of its age.

So, what cultural realities created space and success for the YMCA then and now?

Within the VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity) of its day, the Y was led by men who lamented the decay of their cultural realities, and particular on the vulnerable young men and their families amidst the rapid changes in society:

  • unprecedented chaos in communities
  • increased conditions of poverty
  • upended social and religious traditions
  • undermined confidence in assumptions about the good, true, beautiful and just
  • it overemphasized the importance of individuality at the expense of their duty to family and place
  • these young men were cut off from sources of stability and forced to make their own meaning
  • they are now in competition with everyone else for work and building off a life
  • the Y sought to create an association for these young men to offer a safe place and trustworthy friends in the British Protestant evangelical Christian tradition

Religion permeates everything, and though in 1844 there were already secularizing forces in effect in the West, sacred expectations and accounts of reality still held a tentative dominance – thus the flourishing of the YMCA in Europe, and the world.

And so now part the fate of the Y is tied to the religious energy and sacred influence in its Western civilization and evangelical Protestantism context.

The YMCA was a religious response to the evil manifestations of the Industrial Revolution, the gross impoverishing of families, the individualistic and secularist fruits of the Imperial and Empirical Enlightenment, and the shifting social values of Victorian London.

It is not insignificant that in light of the particular religious and cultural motivations and goals of the YMCA, that it sought to work alongside churches ecumenically instead of against them, that it sought to avoid doctrinal divisions, it tried to focus on individual and associational loyalty to Jesus Christ and the kingdom he embodied and proclaimed, as interpreted via The Beatitudes and the Gethsemane Prayer.

It is also not insignificant to observe the principle of protesting inherent to Protestant Christianity, the freedom of belief it emphasizes to individuals, and communities.

All of this to note that secularism can be seen and understood in part as an expression of the Christian freedom of belief and a form of protest that is inherent to Protestant Christianity.

When those hurt or betrayed by the Church protest the abuses, and are either ignored or further abused, disillusionment, revolution, and unbelief can be born and take root.

Per the Protestant Principle (Tillich), only an “always reforming” religion radically loyal to the truth and reality, to human dignity – individually and tribally – that draws on the accumulated wisdom of the ages can provide a “thick”enough tradition in our increasingly dangerous yet beautiful universe to work towards a just reconciliation amongst the wounded and wrong-doers, with no scapegoats nor sacrificing the innocent (per Girard).

Secularism used to promise peace as an alternative to violent religious disagreements – but now we know that it is human violence that is natural, and secularism provides too thin and individualistic rationale, too weak of a social bond, to respond in a healing and truthful way amidst the perpetual abuse and exponential violence..

If the USA continues to embrace secularism as a form of peacekeeping amidst religious plurality, it runs a risk of fomenting “thin spirits” of religious misunderstandings – thus unable to use religious resources itself to lead the majority of religious communities through their darkest hours of chaos – which requires mature and wise religious adherents.

If the YMCA can find a way to nourish our specific Christian heritage, then we can speak with a humble authority on the pressing issues of poverty and inequity in our highly religious nation, and have a place to firmly plant our feet in order to boldly serve and care with the least of these, to do hospitality and welcome the stranger, while also taking needed critique, support protesting, fueling reform, and striving in humility for mercy and justice to all – as embodied in Christ and having been put into practice through twenty centuries throughout the world.

What is the future of the Y?

It is tied in with the chaos of our culture, and so whatever it is, it is not to usher in any kind of utopia.

Because of the undeniable violence endemic to humanity, people will be killing people until the Earth meets its fate in accordance with the destiny of our Sun or our own nuclear holocaust.

There is no way to establish permanent peace on Earth; there are only beliefs and practices which either exacerbate violence or wisely foster just mercy in light of its lingering infection.

Since religion emerged as a vital and enduring way to sustain communities in light of the real and eternal violence, the YMCA can embrace reality of religion and violence, or avoid beliefs about peacemaking that comes from pursuing a utopia.

What if the Y became sources of brilliant wisdom on religion AND multi-cultural realities in its communities?

What if the Y honestly and responsibly embraced its complex Christianity, and then through it learned how to care-fully respect and love the poor, our neighbors, and strangers of different religions and cultures?

What are ways to pledge our loyalty to Jesus as the YMCA in a VUCA world so that we sustain creative adaptations rooted in a “thick” love of humanity?

To conclude:

Is the Y still religious? Yes.

The USA is one of the most religious nations on Earth, and the majority of the population identify in some way with Christianity, and the YMCA is at the heart of America’s religious and Christian identity.

What makes the Y still religious?

Our history is undeniable, our culture was birthed in religion, our attitudes and spirit are all forged in a particular kind of “social gospel” Christianity, as well as the enduring yearning for unity, for equity, and Jesus-inspired love for all.

How can I tell if the Y is still religious?

Are there still religious people participating in the YMCA?

Are there still religious people living out of the history and culture and spirit of the Y?

Are there religious and secular Y members committed to unity, equity, care for the poor and welcome for all?

Are there still religious people open to sharing about their faith traditions and inviting others to learn more about it?

Are there people in leadership and on the front lines with the YMCA motivated by their religion to help the Y succeed in its mission and legacy?

Yes.

Can the Y still be religious if there are non-religious people in leadership and on the front lines?

Yes; the freedom to believe, or not, is crucial.

What if I don’t see any religious symbols?

It all depends on what you know about the Y and what you are looking for: the Y logo is highly religious, if you know our history; our mission and values and cause are highly religious if you know our legacy.

YMCA Triangle, stained glass at Springfield College, former Y ministry training school. A classic religious value and purpose of the YMCA, expressed by St. Paul to the Christians in Ephesus (4:13) “…until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.”

If the Y is still religious, does that mean it is dying out and becoming irrelevant as more people leave organized religion?

Religion is an existential reality for humanity, it will always be centrally crucial to our flourishing.

Thus, to the degree that the Y accepts, adapts, and fulfills its religious and Christian origins and calling, it will be one of the few institutions left in our society with the moral authority to critique (including itself) abuse of power and with the spiritual vitality to overcome religious and cultural divisions while building bridges in an increasingly dangerous world.

When is religion at its best, when is the Y most Christian?

When we are taking care of the widows and orphans in our communities, when we are with the most vulnerable in our neighborhoods, loving, caring, serving alongside them as the hands and heart of Jesus.

To the degree that the Y is striving to be with and for the least of these, in faithfulness to Christ, we are still religious, we are still embodying the original spirit of the Young Men’s Christian Association.

My Source/Reading List:

  • Rene Girard, I Saw Satan Fall Like Lightening
  • Charles Taylor, A Secular Age
  • Richard Beck, Hunting Magic Eels
  • Miroslav Volf, Flourishing, A Public Faith
  • Martin Luther King, Jr., Strength To Love
  • Luke Burgis, Wanting
  • Lesslie Newbigin, The Gospel In A Pluralist Society
  • Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and The Last Man
  • Phillip Jenkins, The Lost History of Christianity, The Next Christendom
  • Henri Nouwen, The Wounded Healer
  • Jaroslav Pelikan, Jesus Through The Centuries
  • James Davison Hunter, To Change The World
  • David Fitch, Faithful Presence
  • Paul Tillich, The Courage To Be, The Protestant Era
  • Reinhold Niebuhr, Christianity and Power Politics
  • Michael Gorman, Becoming The Gospel
  • Jacques Ellul, The Presence of The Kingdom
  • Bryan Stevenson, Just Mercy
  • Cornell West, The Cornell West Reader
  • Soong-Chan Rah, The Next Evangelicalism
  • Howard Thurman, Jesus and the Disinherited
  • William Cavanaugh, Field Hospital
  • Wolfhart Pannenberg, The Apostles Creed, The Church
  • H. Richard Niebuhr, The Kingdom of God In America
  • C. Howard Hopkins, The History of the YMCA in North America, John R. Mott: the Biography
  • Clifford Putney, Muscular Christianity
  • Clyde Binfield, George Williams and the YMCA
  • Thomas Winter, Making Men, Making Class
  • Nina Mjagkij, Men and Women Adrift
  • and more…

[there is much that can be critiqued and questioned in my article, and I would welcome your comments; and: above is a sample of sources that shape my perception of ways the Y is still religious and Christian – I’d appreciate suggestions to add to the list.]

For more on this theme, read:

The “C” In The YMCA Today

YMCA: as Obstacle, Offense and Opportunity

Christianity, Christians and Christ in the YMCA: The Flourishing and Withering of Human Solidarity

John 17:21 & Our Flourishing

John 17:21 & Our Flourishing ::: what are ways the mission and Christian origins of the YMCA enliven our work these days to strengthen the foundations of our community for all? Especially for diverse Christians in the Y striving to live out their faith in an inclusive, equitable and global way…

Unity.

It’s like a shattered dream.

German concentration camp, Flossenberg

Yet, it still compels a certain kind of yearning:

“If only we were more authentically united, we would have more peace.”

That’s my summary of what I hear people say.

We are not wrong to want unity, nor in the wrong to make attempts to forge unity in a hope for peace.

It’s just that calls for peace in general, abstract speeches for unity ring hollow after awhile.

How many of us want the results of peace without the work of unity?

In my church world the prayer for unity by Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane is getting a lot of traction (again).

It’s a beautiful prayer, very personal, raw, emotional and grand in its vision for humanity and God.

For Christians in any given community, there is usually some kind of chronic conflict disturbing the peace.

The garden prayer reminds us that the unity God wants for us most is oneness with Christ Jesus and the other “little Christ’s” in our world.

Maybe because of our public role in the community we can have a hand in preventing further disunity or defend it from worse conflict.

But as a Christian, in both our public and private world, the unity that matters most and that has the greatest power for unity in the world is to be found in the garden prayer of Jesus.

Here is a key part of that prayer:

“Father, my prayer is not that you take (my disciples) out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one.

They are not of the world, even as I am not of it.

Sanctify them by the truth; your Word is truth.

As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world.

For them I sanctify myself, that they too may be sanctified in truth.

My prayer is not for them alone.

I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you.

May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me.

I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one – so that they may be brought to complete unity.

Then the world will know that you have sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.”

[Jesus, in John’s Gospel, 17:15-23]

In the news media these days there is deep yearning for unity and peace to prevail between the people of Israel and Palestine.

Here in the USA there is a passionate desire for unity and peace to heal the racial divide.

How many families, how many friends have become painfully are separated in spirit, mind and body due to divisions over vaccines, election integrity, political ideology, and just plain drifting apart due to irreconcilable differences?

From whence comes any kind or real unity and peace in our world of suffering, chaos and disillusionment?

We as a global humanity have more scientific and technical answers for what disrupts unity and peace for a national society, tribe and culture than ever.

Same for tested theories of reconciliation and healing.

But, however abstract and principled these observations and theories may be, it is often not a matter of knowledge or information that keeps us from doing peacemaking and unification.

It is likely much more a matter of the will, of our desires, of what we want to choose.

We humans live through the heart, and too often merely use our head to justify what our heart feels, believes, sees, hears and experiences.

Jesus prays from the heart for unity within humanity: in particular those who will see him, hear him, believe him, and follow in his truth.

These humans in the first century were derisively called “little Christ’s” for their imitation of Jesus.

Despite the mocking and persecution they became a community, an embodiment of this prayer by Jesus for unity, truth, peace and love.

The current disunity in the world is mostly driven by incentivized envy and greed, insatiable lust and gluttony, lazy apathy towards others who suffer but bitter anger over ones own; mostly though it is wounded pride that drives ourselves, our tribes and modern societies to vengeful and “defensive” violence and madness.

This is generally true throughout recorded human history around the world.

For the past two millennia Christians have entered into almost these tribes and societies in the world, establishing the presence of Christ there through little communities.

What happens though is that these “little Christ’s” over identify with the culture and then too little with the presence of Christ Jesus.

Christ inclusively connects and unites his diverse followers around the globe, even when they come from warring tribes and societies pitted against each other.

For example, too many USA Christians over identify with the government of Israel and are mostly ignorant of the Palestinian Christians suffering in the Holy Land.

Or, here in the USA, too many White Christians are in denial of the racism that has wounded Black Christians in spirit, mind and body.

There is also the ecological crisis, of how wealthy Christians in the world despoil and degrade the land and cultures of poor Christians.

Of course there is rationalization and justification of intent and motives, of actions and consequences that blunts the conviction to repent, confess, lament, be sorrowful for the sinful brokenness and pride which is adversarial to Jesus’ prayer of unity.

Let’s not deny the truth of the experience of suffering, both of Jesus and those who through the past 21 centuries have also suffered at the hands of those with political, economic and religious power.

Jesus is the incarnation of God’s Spirit in the human spirit, mind and body.

Whatever Jesus prays and does, it’s an embodiment of God’s desire for the world he created and the people he loves.

When Jesus prays for unity, love and truth, it’s not an overspiritualization at the expense of material cynical reality.

It’s the wisdom of God for how he is at work in the world that he fashioned and still holds in his hands, so to speak.

The flourishing of Christians is an overflow from being united with Christ and each other.

It does not mean there is no more suffering.

But it does mean no more suffering alone, no more suffering without faith, hope and love.

In this world we will suffer. But will there also be any flourishing in its midst?

What sets apart “little Christ’s” in communities across the globe is there solidarity with those who suffer across the globe.

It is the way of the world to hate their enemy, to take an eye for an eye, and give help to only their own.

But Jesus embodies a different kind of way, truth and life in the world; those that follow it are set apart, are sanctified, and strive to love their enemies, heal the unthankful, turn the other cheek, and seek just mercy for all.

What’s the vision that empowers Christians to strive for this kind of unity and flourishing?

Jesus prays that we who are his followers would have union with each other like he has with the Father, and that we would have union with both Father and Son, through the life-giving, spirit, mind, body -saving power of the Holy Spirit.

Theosis is the theological word for this dynamic transformation, of our oneness with each other as we are made one with God in Jesus through the Spirit.

Somehow this begins in this life on Earth,

There is no movie-soundtrack that accompanies theosis, no awards ceremony to recognize the achievements, no social media promotions to highlight theosis.

Theosis is gritty, it can be grueling, it is forged amidst suffering, as we strive for just mercy for the neighbors we love and hate, for the fellow Christians whom we enjoy and those we don’t understand.

Theosis is fueled by imitation of Jesus, by submitting to the Same Spirit which energized his work, by a vision of God sustained through trust.

Theosis and flourishing go together, along with the suffering that comes from being fully human in this real world.

There is no utopia!

Theosis is not about perfection in this life, it’s not about convenience, efficiency or effectiveness.

Theosis is about the fruit of the Spirit bearing out in our lives as we follow in the way, truth and life of the Jew Jesus.

Theosis looks like God sending Jesus into the world, which we can read about in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures.

Theosis looks like the apostle and disciples of Jesus being sent into the real world to proclaim the gritty gospel, preaching repentance and forgiveness of divisive sin – to the ends of the Earth.

Theosis requires love; this kind of love from Jesus to us that flows through us to fellow humanity is patient, this love is kind, it does not envy or boast in pride, it does not greedily seek its own at another’s expense, and like God is not easily angered.

Theosis is experienced through love that rejoices in the truth, a love that keeps no record of wrong, a love that does not delight in evil.

Our flourishing in theosis is experienced in God’s love for us and our love for neighbors, strangers and enemies; a love that always protects, always trusts, always hopes, a uniting love that always perseveres amidst the suffering and evil in the world.

Flourishing, theosis, love – it is all in the details.

Every day.

Being present, in the chaos and injustice, the mundane and boring, the busyness and hecticness.

It’s the courage to be, the courage to believe you are loved by God, the courage to desire unity, theosis, and flourishing despite observable inequities and brokenness all around us.

Shattered dreams are a crucial and painful moment that test our resolve to keep the faith, to keep hoping and loving (ala Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.)

Jesus’ prayer for our unity and flourishing, our theosis, occurred while on his knees in the Garden of Gethsemane, the night of his betrayal where he begged God to take this cup of suffering from him.

With drops of blood on his brow he prayed to accept the will of God.

His shattered spirit, mind and body on the cross would seem to have rendered his prayers ineffective.

Yet…the union he had with God before and after that shattering were transformative, they were the opening up of a new kind of theosis and flourishing for all.

May your desire for unity and peace, may your yearning for theosis with God in Jesus through the Spirit, amidst the chaos and suffering of our world, bear the fruit of flourishing for all Creation.

The Ecclesia of the New Testament and the YMCA / by Emil Brunner

Professor Brunner is considered one of the greatest European Christian theologians in the early to mid 20th century. His enormous and brilliant influence on the YMCA is revealed in this essay he penned, inspired by his friendship with John R. Mott, to encourage and guide the Y in their faithfulness to Christ amidst a radically swift-changing post-war culture in Britain, Germany, and America.


The posted article below is an excerpt by Emil Brunner from Toward Our Second Century, a report of the plenary meeting of the World’s Committee of the Young Men’s Christian Organization at Geneva, Switzerland in July, 1953. Archived by the World Alliance YMCA

A theological advisor to the Y.M.C.A. in 1948.

————————-

“From its very beginning the YMCA has set great store by the fact that it is not a church.

It has rather exhorted its members to join a church. This conception and policy has stood the test and will remain the same in the future.

The ecumenical movement, however, and more especially the creation of the World Council of Churches, has required a re-thinking which, of course, has to start from and be based upon the New Testament.

If we read without prejudice what the New Testament says about Ecclesia, we see that this word signifies a reality which resembles the YMCA at least as much as today’s so-called churches.

The bodies which generally are recognized as “churches” are at least as different from the Ecclesia of the New Testament as the YMCA.

For Ecclesia is nothing else than a brotherhood of people bound together with Jesus Christ and with each other by the Holy Spirit and leading their daily life in such fellowship.

The Ecclesia is described to us as a common life under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, a common life in Faith, in Hope, and in Love, where what we are used to calling characteristic features of a church, “ecclesiastical” institutions, ecclesiastical offices, ecclesiastical actives do not play an essential role.

The following points deserve attention:

  1. There is no distinction between priests and laymen, but the whole community is “a priestly people”, everybody is expected to to act in a priestly manner.
  2. There is no sacrificial rite, but on the contrary: by the sacrifice of Christ all other sacrifices are done away forever, whereas everybody, each member of the community, is supposed to dedicate his or her life to God as an acceptable sacrifice.
  3. Each member of the community is called upon for service in the community. There is no difference between “active” and “passive” members, but, as each organ within a living organism exercises its function to the benefit of the whole, thus everybody within the Ecclesia is an organ fit for a function of which a “service” is expected and rendered. Non-active members have to be regarded as non-functioning dead organs and be cut off.
  4. There are certainly special Sunday meetings of the community for “worship”. But again, what matters most is that everybody contributes to the edification of the community, that nobody is passed over because some want to monopolize speaking.
  5. But these Sunday meetings of the community are not called Divine Service. On the contrary the daily life of the individual Christians, who dedicate their life to God as sacrifice, explicitly receive this title. Therefore, everyday life in the service of men in love is the genuine divine service.
  6. For this reason there is such a gulf, characteristic of our ecclesiastical life, between “Divine Service and Everyday Life”, between a “spiritual” and a “profane” realm outside. Everything is “spiritual” – even the most secular thing, if it is done united with Christ; then also eating and drinking then also trivial everyday work is “spiritual” if it is done “in Christ”.

If therefore the members of a YMCA by their faith are really united with Christ and the love which is flowing out of this faith unites them with the fellow members that they feel as brethren, and if these members regard their activities as service to Christ and to the brethren and sacrifice their lives in this service, they are Ecclesia as well as any church.

This insight is of utmost importance because it permits us to conceive our “secular” work, be it in sports groups, in professional evening classes, in manual work of the Boy’s Town in Indian slums, as spiritual work, as “church work in the meaning of the New Testament.”

Not the subject itself, Bible Study or sports, but the motive for the one as for the other: to serve Christ and to serve the brother, constitutes the difference between spiritual and non-spiritual; not the affiliation to a certain church makes our work Christian, but the belonging to Christ of each worker.

On the other hand, this insight makes us independent from the principle of “practical success.”

There are other organizations today, UNO, UNESCO, international emergency organizations or individual governments, doing the same as we do, seen from the outside, doing it even better than we can because of more money available to them.

Yet it is quite another thing, as it does not spring forth from the source of love of Christ and therefore is not realized in the same spirit.

Our social work does not have its value in itself, but as a demonstration of the love of Christ.

We are not a YMCA because of the model swimming pools available to everyone, but because we build and use a swimming pool to bring the love of Christ to young men.

The YMCA has little importance as an institution of welfare.

The YMCA either is a form of Ecclesia or it is nothing.

If it is not Ecclesia it is useless, amateurish duplicate of public welfare institutions.

Thus we arrive at this peculiar statement: the YMCA is inwardly Ecclesia, church in the meaning of the New Testament; outwardly it is a welfare institution for young people of all nations.

The fact that it unites this interior with this exterior makes its character and is the basis of its peculiar, incomparable activity.

There are, therefore, two dangerous deviations which may cause the YMCA to miss its destiny.

The first: that it loses its soul, that it ceases to be Ecclesia.

The second: that it loses its particular body, that it becomes a mere institution of one of the churches, a “church youth group” whose main purpose is Bible study.

The first one is wrong extraversion, the second a wrong intraversion.

In the first case, the YMCA ceases to be Christian; in the second case it ceases to be YMCA.

The centenary of the year 1955 must help each local and national YMCA all over the world to grasp this insight of the homogeneousness of body and soul and to win back the soul which the YMCA has lost in many places.

There is less danger for the exterior, for the “body” of the YMCA; for this exterior social service is evident to everybody and can be started rather easily.

The main danger is the first, the loss of the Christian soul, the character as Ecclesia.

The most important task of the Ecclesia in the New Testament is to make Christ known to all men.

Therefore the most important task of the YMCA is to win the youth of our time for Christ. Youth for Christ, Christ for Youth.

Whether this is done by swimming pools, evening classes, sports training or Bible and Prayer Meetings is not the main question.

What matters only is the aim that young people come into a living contact with Christ.

This, however, can only happen if the Bible is read, where it is preached; and where experiences are shared in a heartfelt, sincere, brotherly manner.

The soul of the YMCA cannot live without being nurtured and purified by the sources of faith.

We may imagine the ideal YMCA a society of young people looking very worldly, open to everybody, which is attractive by its activities for young people and renders service to them. But while it looks rather worldly from the outside, the leading men inside are eager to speak to the young people of Jesus Christ as soon as they ask: why are you doing that? why are you so kind to us? why are you interested in just me?

To proclaim the message of Jesus Christ with a few words in such moments, to explain what actually is a YMCA – that is the proper aim.

The YMCA is a proof that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is no “religion” but the love of men based upon the love of God.

Therefore it is possible to bear witness to Christ by simple exterior services.

Where there is real love towards men, there Christ is at work; where Christ really is at work, there is genuine love towards men.

The foundation of Ecclesia is God’s Love in Jesus Christ, received and accepted by human hearts.

There is no need for a creed, even the Paris Basis, a model of brevity.

Who loves Christ and is willing to obey Him belongs to it. Who does not love Him and does not obey Him does not belong to it.

The love of Christ is the sole criterion; the unquestionable manifestation of this love to Christ is love to the brethren, willingness to serve the brethren.

Therefore the “Christian Religion” is something so simple, something so ecclesiastical, something so laymen-like.

That is why the YMCA has such an extraordinarily good chance to serve Christ.

The churches have their particular values and services and the YMCA cannot do better than remain on a good relationship with them all.

They certainly have much to give to their members which the YMCA cannot provide.

But, it is able to give the most essential to young people if its soul, its hidden innermost, is the communion with Christ, which moves it to act and guides it, that is to say if it really is a kind of Ecclesia.”

———————————

Professor Brunner is considered one of the greatest European Christian theologians in the early to mid 20th century. His enormous and brilliant influence on the YMCA is revealed in this essay he penned, inspired by his friendship with John R. Mott, to encourage and guide the Y in their faithfulness to Christ amidst a radically swift-changing post-war culture in Britain, Germany, and America.

For a very brief overview of Emil Brunner’s life, Christian ministry and theological significance, read this overview by the Study Centre for Faith and Society.

For more about the brilliant and compelling writings of Emil Brunner, read this review by Roger Olsen.

For more in depth exploration of Dr. Brunner’s scholarship, read this paper by Alister McGrath.

For a fuller account of Emil Brunner’s writings and their helpfulness yet today, check out this book by Dr. McGrath.
Click here for the story behind this 1900 YMCA that met in a Skagway, Alaska Presbyterian church.