Providing Christian resources from the YMCA past and present to nourish inclusive, equitable work in our diverse and global neighborhoods that build up healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
What can you do in this coming year in honor of George Williams legacy to lift up youth, to embody the grace of Christ, and enter into the challenges of our generation with courage and wisdom?
It’s a joy to remember the origins of the Y, why we got our start, who all helped make it possible, and for what ends.
When you become a member of the Y, you join a global movement created in 1844 to save young men in spirit, mind and body.
All these years later, the Christian heart of the Y has built up an organization focused on welcome and hospitality, empowerment and solidarity, justice and peace, faith and hope; but the greatest of these is love.
What can you do in this coming year in honor of George Williams legacy to lift up youth, to embody the grace of Christ, and enter into the challenges of our generation with courage and wisdom?
This extended reflection below on the reality and role of religion and Christianity in the Y hopefully will spur a constructive yet critical conversation that “builds a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.”
For me, context is often key to discerning what factors are shaping us now, where they are sourced, and what it is arcing towards.
Oversimplification can be a way of starting to make sense of complex and ambiguous circumstances.
By combining broader insights, one can begin to discern relevant insights – the questions then follow on how it seems to correspond with our experience and awareness of reality.
What is reality? How to describe it?
As St. Paul muses with the Corinthian Christians in the mid first century – we can only see and know partially – this includes love, the present, ourselves, the cosmos.
Everyone has multiple lens through which we see and interpret the world, and a myriad of biases that shape how you participate in and interpret it; some we become aware of, many we don’t.
What is the reality of the YMCA and the church in America these days?
How is it really doing? Well? Amazing? Poorly? Disgraceful? Compared to what? Utopia? Dystopia? Status quo?
To ask more probing questions: what is the role of religion in reality?
What is the value of the Christian religion in historical reality?
What is the foundation of Protestant churches in America?
What are the religious roots of the YMCA’s existence and success? And failures?
Should the original religious (and cultural/political) purposes of the YMCA have an enduring authority to determine our missional and organizational health or viability?
For the sake of this article, I’m humbly attempting to add to the growing conversation in a meaningful and nuanced way the role of faith and religion as a dimension of diversity in the YMCA.
Some of my key assumptions:
+ “religion” is the most dynamic and pervading dimension of reality (religion also defined as faith tradition or existential ideology).
+ North America is a highly religious continent and full of religious-shaped cultures, and every institution is profoundly affected by religion, either caught in its orbit or resisting it in some manner.
+ organized faith traditions are public institutions (often as 501(c)3 non-profits), and local congregations are crucial manifestations of religious traditions and values in its vast variety (like caring for the poor and children, spiritual formation, etc.); participants in it cover the full spectrum of adherence from high to low, passionate to cynical, educated to still learning.
+ for Christianity in its many religious manifestations, it is primarily expressed culturally and sociologically; thus it’s many branches and traditions and denominations and sects are reflections of the divisions generally understood between the Eastern and Western Civilizations, the Global North and Global South, Reformation and Counter-Reformations, Empires and Nationalism, Technological Adaptations in every sphere of human industry. And more….
+ religion in general is also an anthropological reality; a profound way of vulnerable humans striving in tribes for survival amidst the terrifying yet sustaining natural forces of Earth and the Milky Way and our Universe(s).
+ an enduring role of religion, according to Rene Girard, is to provide sustaining ways for communities to deal with the recurring murderous violence endemic to all people always – in order for a tribe to thrive in the dangerous natural world, they had to overcome the human pride and envy which continually tempts them to kill one another and destroy their capacity to organize and trust each other.
+ beyond the particular expressions of classic religions like Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. is the commonly observed role of religion in their tribes and nations of origins for surviving and thriving, making sense of their existence in particular geographies and generations, amidst the continual technological adaptions humans make out of necessity, opportunity and ability.
+ interestingly, the great religious traditions just mentioned are all originally Eastern Civilization realities, from the Middle/South; however they manifested and took root in the West, they are at their heart tribal, collectivist, and Eastern.
+ often “strengths” and “weakness” are two sides of the same coin, so to speak, or more about how the same tool is applied either appropriately or inappropriately – aka: to a hammer everything is a nail, or as in Ecclesiastes, there is a time for everything, including a time to plant and a time to uproot, to laugh and to weep – and it is wisdom to discern right timing and action.
+ the strengths and weaknesses of religion are similar: it provides boundaries for what is acknowledged as true and real, and most conducive to surviving and thriving of the tribe, and excludes those who deny or reject it; for those in acquiescence, the boundaries and exclusion are right and good, for those who resist or rebel, well they draw the opposing conclusion.
+ a strength and weakness of religion and cultures is the spectrum of individuality and collectivism, of the duty to love the tribe and sacrifice self, of the submission of self to a greater authority and tradition: to those who are drawn to the ends of the spectrums (hyper-individualistic vs. hyper-collectivist) the more divergent and dire are their differing descriptions of what is healthy vs sick…
+ all of this generalized oversimplification to highlight the Western context of the Protestant Reformation (Northern Europeans: German, Swiss, French) against the Catholic Church (Southern Europe: Italy), which itself was deeply shaped by the Great Schism five centuries earlier when the Western Roman Church broke from the Eastern Byzantine Church (a cultural, political, economic, geographical, hence a theological driven split)
+ three centuries into the Protestant Reformation (which also corresponded with the Renaissance and Enlightenment, Industrial Revolution, and Imperial transitions to Nation-States) emerged the Young Men’s Christian Association – a humanitarian and religious product of its age.
So, what cultural realities created space and success for the YMCA then and now?
Within the VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity) of its day, the Y was led by men who lamented the decay of their cultural realities, and particular on the vulnerable young men and their families amidst the rapid changes in society:
unprecedented chaos in communities
increased conditions of poverty
upended social and religious traditions
undermined confidence in assumptions about the good, true, beautiful and just
it overemphasized the importance of individuality at the expense of their duty to family and place
these young men were cut off from sources of stability and forced to make their own meaning
they are now in competition with everyone else for work and building off a life
the Y sought to create an association for these young men to offer a safe place and trustworthy friends in the British Protestant evangelical Christian tradition
Religion permeates everything, and though in 1844 there were already secularizing forces in effect in the West, sacred expectations and accounts of reality still held a tentative dominance – thus the flourishing of the YMCA in Europe, and the world.
And so now part the fate of the Y is tied to the religious energy and sacred influence in its Western civilization and evangelical Protestantism context.
The YMCA was a religious response to the evil manifestations of the Industrial Revolution, the gross impoverishing of families, the individualistic and secularist fruits of the Imperial and Empirical Enlightenment, and the shifting social values of Victorian London.
It is not insignificant that in light of the particular religious and cultural motivations and goals of the YMCA, that it sought to work alongside churches ecumenically instead of against them, that it sought to avoid doctrinal divisions, it tried to focus on individual and associational loyalty to Jesus Christ and the kingdom he embodied and proclaimed, as interpreted via The Beatitudes and the Gethsemane Prayer.
It is also not insignificant to observe the principle of protesting inherent to Protestant Christianity, the freedom of belief it emphasizes to individuals, and communities.
All of this to note that secularism can be seen and understood in part as an expression of the Christian freedom of belief and a form of protest that is inherent to Protestant Christianity.
When those hurt or betrayed by the Church protest the abuses, and are either ignored or further abused, disillusionment, revolution, and unbelief can be born and take root.
Per the Protestant Principle (Tillich), only an “always reforming” religion radically loyal to the truth and reality, to human dignity – individually and tribally – that draws on the accumulated wisdom of the ages can provide a “thick”enough tradition in our increasingly dangerous yet beautiful universe to work towards a just reconciliation amongst the wounded and wrong-doers, with no scapegoats nor sacrificing the innocent (per Girard).
Secularism used to promise peace as an alternative to violent religious disagreements – but now we know that it is human violence that is natural, and secularism provides too thin and individualistic rationale, too weak of a social bond, to respond in a healing and truthful way amidst the perpetual abuse and exponential violence..
If the USA continues to embrace secularism as a form of peacekeeping amidst religious plurality, it runs a risk of fomenting “thin spirits” of religious misunderstandings – thus unable to use religious resources itself to lead the majority of religious communities through their darkest hours of chaos – which requires mature and wise religious adherents.
If the YMCA can find a way to nourish our specific Christian heritage, then we can speak with a humble authority on the pressing issues of poverty and inequity in our highly religious nation, and have a place to firmly plant our feet in order to boldly serve and care with the least of these, to do hospitality and welcome the stranger, while also taking needed critique, support protesting, fueling reform, and striving in humility for mercy and justice to all – as embodied in Christ and having been put into practice through twenty centuries throughout the world.
What is the future of the Y?
It is tied in with the chaos of our culture, and so whatever it is, it is not to usher in any kind of utopia.
Because of the undeniable violence endemic to humanity, people will be killing people until the Earth meets its fate in accordance with the destiny of our Sun or our own nuclear holocaust.
There is no way to establish permanent peace on Earth; there are only beliefs and practices which either exacerbate violence or wisely foster just mercy in light of its lingering infection.
Since religion emerged as a vital and enduring way to sustain communities in light of the real and eternal violence, the YMCA can embrace reality of religion and violence, or avoid beliefs about peacemaking that comes from pursuing a utopia.
What if the Y became sources of brilliant wisdom on religion AND multi-cultural realities in its communities?
What are ways to pledge our loyalty to Jesus as the YMCA in a VUCA world so that we sustain creative adaptations rooted in a “thick” love of humanity?
To conclude:
Is the Y still religious? Yes.
The USA is one of the most religious nations on Earth, and the majority of the population identify in some way with Christianity, and the YMCA is at the heart of America’s religious and Christian identity.
What makes the Y still religious?
Our history is undeniable, our culture was birthed in religion, our attitudes and spirit are all forged in a particular kind of “social gospel” Christianity, as well as the enduring yearning for unity, for equity, and Jesus-inspired love for all.
How can I tell if the Y is still religious?
Are there still religious people participating in the YMCA?
Are there still religious people living out of the history and culture and spirit of the Y?
Are there religious and secular Y members committed to unity, equity, care for the poor and welcome for all?
Are there still religious people open to sharing about their faith traditions and inviting others to learn more about it?
Are there people in leadership and on the front lines with the YMCA motivated by their religion to help the Y succeed in its mission and legacy?
Yes.
Can the Y still be religious if there are non-religious people in leadership and on the front lines?
Yes; the freedom to believe, or not, is crucial.
What if I don’t see any religious symbols?
It all depends on what you know about the Y and what you are looking for: the Y logo is highly religious, if you know our history; our mission and values and cause are highly religious if you know our legacy.
If the Y is still religious, does that mean it is dying out and becoming irrelevant as more people leave organized religion?
Religion is an existential reality for humanity, it will always be centrally crucial to our flourishing.
Thus, to the degree that the Y accepts, adapts, and fulfills its religious and Christian origins and calling, it will be one of the few institutions left in our society with the moral authority to critique (including itself) abuse of power and with the spiritual vitality to overcome religious and cultural divisions while building bridges in an increasingly dangerous world.
When is religion at its best, when is the Y most Christian?
When we are taking care of the widows and orphans in our communities, when we are with the most vulnerable in our neighborhoods, loving, caring, serving alongside them as the hands and heart of Jesus.
To the degree that the Y is striving to be with and for the least of these, in faithfulness to Christ, we are still religious, we are still embodying the original spirit of the Young Men’s Christian Association.
My Source/Reading List:
Rene Girard, I Saw Satan Fall Like Lightening
Charles Taylor, A Secular Age
Richard Beck, Hunting Magic Eels
Miroslav Volf, Flourishing, A Public Faith
Martin Luther King, Jr., Strength To Love
Luke Burgis, Wanting
Lesslie Newbigin, The Gospel In A Pluralist Society
Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and The Last Man
Phillip Jenkins, The Lost History of Christianity, The Next Christendom
Henri Nouwen, The Wounded Healer
Jaroslav Pelikan, Jesus Through The Centuries
James Davison Hunter, To Change The World
David Fitch, Faithful Presence
Paul Tillich, The Courage To Be, The Protestant Era
Reinhold Niebuhr, Christianity and Power Politics
Michael Gorman, Becoming The Gospel
Jacques Ellul, The Presence of The Kingdom
Bryan Stevenson, Just Mercy
Cornell West, The Cornell West Reader
Soong-Chan Rah, The Next Evangelicalism
Howard Thurman, Jesus and the Disinherited
William Cavanaugh, Field Hospital
Wolfhart Pannenberg, The Apostles Creed, The Church
H. Richard Niebuhr, The Kingdom of God In America
C. Howard Hopkins, The History of the YMCA in North America, John R. Mott: the Biography
Clifford Putney, Muscular Christianity
Clyde Binfield, George Williams and the YMCA
Thomas Winter, Making Men, Making Class
Nina Mjagkij, Men and Women Adrift
and more…
[there is much that can be critiqued and questioned in my article, and I would welcome your comments; and: above is a sample of sources that shape my perception of ways the Y is still religious and Christian – I’d appreciate suggestions to add to the list.]
We expect the presence of Christ Jesus to bring about transformation in people and places. But how do we participate in it? Passive? Ambitious? Impatient? Idealistic? Cynical? Violently? Coercively? Profitably? French Christian activist and theologian Jacques Ellul writes brilliantly on a revolutionary Christianity, based on his experiences during and after the resistance to Axis powers in WW2. His reflections have great insight for Christians today, especially those in the YMCA.
What kind of “C” are we looking for in the YMCA? A status quo kind of “C” or a revolutionary one?
In focusing more and more on what Christ Jesus taught about the disruptive Kingdom of God, there is some new imagination required for what that would look like in the YMCA and where I live in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Especially when being a pastor in a community organization that seeks to avoid controversy in its striving to be for all.
How to be revolutionary without violence or mimetic rivalry, but also not just struggle in order to get more of the same.
How to think about being a pastor and involved in politics and economic development, with social justice and neighborhood revitalization, without ending up as a pawn or a jerk?
In these days of searching and listening, I turn again to Jacques Ellul.
In my vocation as a pastor with the YMCA, there is some inner questioning on what is the wisest way forward in this complex and volatile context.
I found the following paragraphs to be immensely helpful to me as I seek confirmation of God’s leading in my life’s work:
“The Christian can never regard himself as being on the winning side, nor can he look on with pleasure while everyone else goes to perdition; should he do so, he would be lacking in the Spirit of Christ, and by that very fact he would cease to be a Christian.
Bound up with the lives of other men (be economic and sociological laws, and also by the will of God), he cannot accept the view that they will always remain in their anguish and their disorder, victims of tyranny and overwork, buoyed up only by a hope which seems unfounded.
Thus he must plunge into social and political problems in order to have an influence on the world, not in the hope of making a paradise, but simply in order to make it tolerable – not in order to diminish the opposition between this world and the Kingdom of God, but simply in order to modify the opposition between the disorder of this world and the order of preservation that God wills for it – not in order to ‘bring in’ the Kingdom of God, but in order that the gospel may be proclaimed, that all men may really hear the good news of salvation, through the death and resurrection of Christ.
Thus there are three directions in which the Christian ought to action the world:
First – starting from the point at which God has revealed to him the truth about the human person, he must try to discover the social and political conditions in which this person can live and develop in accordance with God’s order.
Second – this person will develop within a certain framework which God has ordained for him.
This is the order of preservation, without which man lacks his true setting.
Man is not absolutely free in this sphere, any more than he is free in the physical or biological domain.
There are certain limits which he cannot overstep without danger to the society to which he belongs.
Thus the Christian must work, in order that the will of God may be incarnated in actual institutions and organisms.
Third– this order of preservation will have meaning only if it is directed towards the proclamation of salvation.
Therefore, social and political institutions need to be ‘open’: that is, they must not claim to be all, or absolutes.
Thus they must be constituted in such a way that they do not prevent man from hearing the Word of God.
The Christian must be ceaselessly on the watch – intelligent and alert – to see that this ‘order’ is preserved.
But, in doing so, he will find that he is confronted by two possible errors.
The one error consists in believing that by constant progress in this order we shall attain the Kingdom of God.
It is enough to remind ourselves of the Book of Revelation, or of Matthew 24, to condemn this attitude.
The other error arises out of the conviction that by achieving certain reforms we shall have reached this order which God wills.
In reality all solutions – all economic, political, and other achievements – are temporary.
At no moment can the Christian believe either in their perfection or in their permanence.
They are always vitiated by the sin which infects them, by the setting in which they take place.
Thus the Christian is constantly obliged to reiterate the claims of God, to reestablish this God-willed order, in presence of an order that constantly tends towards disorder.
In consequence of the claims which God is always making on the world the Christian finds himself, by that very fact, involved in a state of permanent revolution.
Even when the institutions, the laws, the reforms which he has advocated have been achieved, even if society is reorganized according to his suggestions, he still has to be in opposition, he still must require more, for the claim of God is as infinite as His forgiveness.
Thus the Christian is called to question unceasingly all that man calls progress, discovery, facts, established results, reality, etc.
He can never be satisfied with all this human labor, transcended, or replaced by something else.
In his judgment he is guided by the Holy Spirit – he is making an essentially revolutionary act.
If the Christian is not being revolutionary, then in some way or another he has been unfaithful to his calling in the world.”
Jacques Ellul, The Presence of the Kingdom, pgs 35-37